Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIPV
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture

UNIFIND
Logo UNIPV

|

UNIFIND

unipv.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Corsi
  • Insegnamenti
  • Professioni
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Strutture
  1. Pubblicazioni

Computerized casts for Orthodontic purpose using powder-free intraoral scanners: accuracy, execution time and patient feedback.

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Abstract:
Introduction. Intraoral scanners allow direct images of oral situation, with fewer steps than conventional impressions.The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of digital impressions, traditional impressions, and digitalization of full-arch gypsum models, to evaluate timing of differentmethods and finally to study perception of patients about conventional and digital impression techniques. Methods. Dental arches of fourteen patients were evaluated by alginate impression, titanium dioxide powder-free intraoral scanning (Trios, 3Shape), and digitalization obtained from gypsum models using the same scanner. Conventional and digital techniqueswere evaluated throughmeasurements (lower and upper arch anteroposterior length, lower and upper intercanine distance, and lower and upper intermolar distance) with a caliber for analogic models and using a computer software for digital models (Ortho Analyzer, Great Lakes Orthodontics). In addition, chairside and processing times were recorded. Finally, each patient completed a VAS questionnaire to evaluate comfort. Statistical analyses were performed with ANOVA and Tukey tests for accuracy measurements and paired -test for times and VAS scores. Significance was predetermined at < 0.05. Results. The measurements obtained with intraoral scanning, gypsum models after conventional impression, and digitalized gypsum models were not significantly different. Both chairside and processing times of digital scanning were shorter than the traditional method. VAS reporting patients comfort were significantly higher when evaluating digital impression. Conclusions. Intraoral scanners used for orthodontic applications provide useful data in clinical practice, comparable to conventional impression. This technology is more time efficient than traditional impression and comfortable for patients. Further evolution with more accurate and faster scanners could in future replace traditional impression methods.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Orthodontics, Scanner, Intraoral Scanner, Computerized Cast
Elenco autori:
Sfondrini, Mf; Gandini, P; Malfatto, M; Di Corato, F; Trovati, F; Scribante, A.
Autori di Ateneo:
SCRIBANTE ANDREA
SFONDRINI MARIA FRANCESCA
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unipv.it/handle/11571/1218184
Pubblicato in:
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 25.12.3.0