Data di Pubblicazione:
2007
Abstract:
Latex-free products have been introduced in orthodontics following a growth in the number of latex allergy cases reported. The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency between latex-free and latex
elastics which are normally used in clinics. In this study, 80 latex-free and 80 latex elastics were divided into 4 groups of 20 elastics. Each group was exposed to a variable number of opening/closing
cycles (100, 1200, 2400 or 4800), using a specially adapted machine which simulated the stretching
of these elastomeric products during the dynamics of the mouth. The machine extended the elastics’ inner diameter from 3 to 5 times its original dimension (the extension being comparable to that experienced
during the opening/closing movements of the mouth). Following this, the elastics underwent a dynamic tensile test using the Instron 4301 machine to evaluate possible force loss and deformation. The
different test results were analyzed using the Student t-test and ANOVA test of Tuckey. The test results
showed differences between the two types of elastics particularly in the inner diameter behaviour: the
increase in the inner diameter of the non-latex elastics’ was pronounced. The forces applied by both
types of elastics were similar until 2400 opening/closing cycles were reached. Thereafter, the nonlatex elastics lost a larger force (p < .01). The test results suggest that latex-free elastics must be replaced more frequently than conventional latex elastics.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Orthodontic elastics; Latex hypersensivity; No-latex elastics
Elenco autori:
Gandini, Paola; Gennai, Rossella; Bertoncini, Chiara; Massironi, Sarah
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: