Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIPV
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations

UNIFIND
Logo UNIPV

|

UNIFIND

unipv.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  1. Outputs

Is a separate monotherapy indication warranted for antiepileptic drugs?

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2015
abstract:
Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the only neurotherapeutics for which regulatory approval is consistently separated into monotherapy or adjunctive-therapy indications. Because head-to-head comparisons of AEDs (used in the European Union to approve drugs for monotherapy) have not shown substantial differences in efficacy between drugs, FDA approval for use of an AED as monotherapy has typically been based on trials with novel designs that have been criticised for reasons of ethics and clinical relevance. Many new-generation AEDs have not been approved for monotherapy, causing drug labelling and real-world use to be increasingly inconsistent, with negative consequences for patients. The regulatory requirement for separate monotherapy and adjunctive-therapy indications in epilepsy is unnecessarily restrictive. We recommend that regulatory agencies approve AEDs for the treatment of specific seizure types or epilepsy syndromes, irrespective of concomitant drug use.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Neurology (clinical); PARTIAL-ONSET SEIZURES; NEWLY-DIAGNOSED EPILEPSY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL; SECONDARILY GENERALIZED SEIZURES; CONTROLLED-RELEASE CARBAMAZEPINE;
List of contributors:
Mintzer, Scott; French, Jacqueline A; Perucca, Emilio; Cramer, Joyce A.; Messenheimer, John A.; Blum, David E.; Rogawski, Michael A.; Baulac, Michel
Handle:
https://iris.unipv.it/handle/11571/1109469
Published in:
LANCET NEUROLOGY
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

http://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-lancet-neurology/
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.5.0