Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNIPV
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations

UNIFIND
Logo UNIPV

|

UNIFIND

unipv.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Degrees
  • Courses
  • Jobs
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  1. Outputs

Local anesthesia with SleeperOne S4 computerized device vs traditional syringe and perceived pain in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2023
abstract:
Local anesthesia is performed in dentistry before clinical procedures to avoid pain. Children can show fear at the sight of the needle and pain at its insertion. To make local anesthesia more comfortable, the use of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) systems has been developed to control the flow rate of the anesthetic solution injected through the needle. The aim of the present research is to evaluate and compare the discomfort felt by patients using a traditional syringe and the CCLAD system SleeperOne®, by considering pain, size sensation, bitterness, and vomit. 30 patients were included in the study and randomly assigned to traditional anesthesia or CCLAD. After injection, patients were assessed for the abovementioned outcomes. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 scores was used. As far as pain is concerned, statistically lower mean values were found in the Trial group (p < 0.05). Instead, concerning size, bitterness and vomit perceptions, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (p > 0.05). Linear regressions were calculated considering technique, quadrant, dental arch, tooth, dentition, sex, and age as independent variables. The technique has shown to have a significant influence on pain (p < 0.05), with lower values for SleeperOne® device. Pain resulted significantly influenced by the type of dentition (p < 0.05), with higher scores for deciduous one. Moreover, perceived pain decreased with the increase of the age of patients (p < 0.05). At last, bitterness perception scores resulted to be higher for primary first molars (p < 0.05). SleeperOne® device seems to be a valid support for the reduction of pain related to anesthetic injection, especially in children. Further studies should evaluate CCLADs’ uses combined with lidocaine preanesthetic as well as with conscious sedation through nitrous oxide in order to determine possible synergistic effects between these procedures.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Computerized local anesthesia device; Local anesthesia; Pediatric patients; Pedodontics; SleeperOne; Visual analogue scale
List of contributors:
Vitale, M. C.; Gallo, S.; Pascadopoli, M.; Alcozer, R.; Ciuffreda, Claudio; Scribante, A.
Authors of the University:
ALCOZER ROBERTO
PASCADOPOLI MAURIZIO
SCRIBANTE ANDREA
VITALE MARINA CONSUELO
Handle:
https://iris.unipv.it/handle/11571/1498395
Full Text:
https://iris.unipv.it//retrieve/handle/11571/1498395/593669/JOCPD2022092701.pdf
Published in:
THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.4.3.0