Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Abstract:
Ancient Greek features a number of syntactically and semantically different double
accusative constructions. In part, they occur with ditransitive maleficiary verbs. Most of
these verbs allow for construction variation in connection with different types of Rarguments
(maleficiary in neutral alignment vs. beneficiary in indirect alignment). Based on
behavioral properties of the constructions discussed, we show that some other verbs share
the behavior of maleficiary ditransitives, notably verbs of asking, requesting and ordering.
We argue that both addressees of such verbs and part of the maleficiaries can be
conceptualized as sources, thus providing a link between them. Causative verbs that take
double accusative constructions do not share the behavioral properties of maleficiary verbs
with neutral alignment, due to the connection of causativity with verbal voice.
accusative constructions. In part, they occur with ditransitive maleficiary verbs. Most of
these verbs allow for construction variation in connection with different types of Rarguments
(maleficiary in neutral alignment vs. beneficiary in indirect alignment). Based on
behavioral properties of the constructions discussed, we show that some other verbs share
the behavior of maleficiary ditransitives, notably verbs of asking, requesting and ordering.
We argue that both addressees of such verbs and part of the maleficiaries can be
conceptualized as sources, thus providing a link between them. Causative verbs that take
double accusative constructions do not share the behavioral properties of maleficiary verbs
with neutral alignment, due to the connection of causativity with verbal voice.
Tipologia CRIS:
2.1 Contributo in volume (Capitolo o Saggio)
Keywords:
alignment split, double object construction, passivization, maleficiaries, degrees of
affectedness
Elenco autori:
Luraghi, Silvia; Zanchi, Chiara
Link alla scheda completa:
Titolo del libro:
Ditransitive constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective